Scanning speeds were pretty zippy, and overheads high to start off with but barely noticeable once the product had settled into its surroundings. Stability was not perfect, with a number of scan jobs falling over or failing to complete and some logging oddities which rendered gathering the data rather difficult. The current version has a clean and slick look, nicely laid out and with a decent set of configuration options. Our core sets showed good coverage of the WildList, but once again there were a small number of false alarms in the clean sets, meaning a VB100 award remains just out of reach for Cyren.Įmsisoft’s products have put in some good performances in our tests over the last couple of years, showing a strong improvement over previous incarnations of what used to be known as ‘ A-Squared’. Our set of tasks, on the other hand, showed a distinct slowdown.ĭetection was very strong in the reactive sets, significantly less so in the proactive sets, highlighting the importance of the product’s cloud-based components. Scanning speeds were reasonable, and very consistent, while overheads were quite light and resource use also fairly low. However, these incidents didn’t seem to affect the provision of protection. Stability was dented by a handful of crashes of the interface, mostly during the scanning of large malware sets but also when handling larger logs. The product interface reflects its age, remaining little changed after many years and providing the same fairly basic experience, but with the most important configuration options covered reasonably well. The core certification sets were once again handled very well with no issues to report and another VB100 award is earned by Avira.Ĭyren’s Command solution has a venerable history, much of it under different company names, and has mixed results in our tests, with spells of consistent success somewhat short and dispersed. Resource usage was just a fraction above the average for this month’s set of scores, while our set of activities ran through in very good time.ĭetection rates were very strong indeed, with only the last section of the proactive test showing any drop in coverage, and only a slight one at that. Scanning speeds were decent and very consistent across multiple runs, while file access overheads were barely perceptible thanks to an absence of on-read protection by default. Stability was good for the most part, however we did note a number of scans of larger sets of malware failing to complete properly, an issue we have been investigating along with the product’s developers. The company’s server solution is a proper business product, with its interface using the standard MMC as a base the layout is a little quirky but with a little exploration quickly becomes intuitive and provides a comprehensive set of controls. Avira also maintains an excellent record in our tests, with no fails in over five years and very few tests missed, apart from our annual Linux comparatives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |